- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Chinatown BID Coverage: Telling Only Part of the Story

Must Read

In a couple of hours, supporters and opponents of the proposed Chinatown Business Improvement District will make their respective cases before Community Board 3’s economic development committee. In the last week or so, the story has gotten quite a bit of play in the mainstream media. Just a couple of days ago, a New York Post headline blared, “Chinatown cleaners played dirty with grant.”  The five sentence story made some pretty strong allegations:

They really cleaned up. A $5.4 million LMDC grant awarded to a Chinatown nonprofit to perform street cleaning was instead used to pay for a whopping share of management salaries, “outreach” and office overhead. Between 2006 and 2009, the Chinatown Partnership Local Development Corp. spent $1.4 million of the four-year grant to run its office instead of cleaning Chinatown’s dirty streets, according to financial statements. “It’s crazy. Give me $5 million and I could do a much better job,” said the manager of a flower store on Bayard Street. In 2008, the group spent $605,000 on administrator salaries, rent, office improvements and other overheads. The actual cleaning that year came in at $1 million. The feds have rigorously audited the contract, and no discrepancies have turned up, an LMDC spokesman said.

Since there’s no source indicated in the report, it’s impossible to know for sure where the Post got its info. We can assume it came from past IRS 990 forms, which non-profit organizations are required to file.  BID backers say the story paints a distorted picture by focusing only on financial statements filed before the Chinatown Partnership began paying the cleaning contractor directly. There was a period of time early on, they say, in which city agencies were administering the LMDC money.

You might notice something else missing in the Post story: the other side.  Representatives of the Partnership and Councilmember Margaret Chin (a big BID supporter) were interviewed by reporter Heather Haddon, yet their comments did not make it into the paper.

But there’s no need to single out New York’s most notorious tabloid. NY1, Crain’s and the Daily News all ran recent reports that did not so much as mention any organized opposition to a business improvement district in Chinatown. Citywide news organizations have a need to streamline stories for mass consumption. That’s a given.  In this case, however, they’ve done a lot more than skim over the details. The mainstream coverage so far has failed to tell both sides and has done this community a disservice.

Note: if you would like to see the Partnership’s 990 forms for yourself, they’re available via Guidestar (registration required).  Tonight, we’re expecting BID supporters to answer the allegations made in the Post story in some way. It should be an interesting evening.

- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -

2 COMMENTS

  1. thanks to the Lodown for covering this story…. as it should be of interest to all who love Chinatown.
    For the record the “allegations” you spoke of were not addressed by CPLDC at the CB3 hearing last nite.
    ..though lack of disclosure was brought up by opponents of the BID, no further financial information was forthcoming… with regard to wages of CPLDC’s workers, balance sheet, etc.

  2. True, it was not addressed, a point that will be made in our upcoming story wrapping up last night’s meeting.

    While we don’t take sides in stories, we do believe in transparency. It seems clear to us the public has a right to know how the Clean Streets grant was spent.

Comments are closed.

- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Lower East Side Arts and Events

A few upcoming events that caught our eye this week: "The Village! A Disco Daydream" returns to Dixon Place for...

More Articles Like This

Sign up for Our Weekly Newsletter!